What do we mean when we say an operation works?

نویسنده

  • Richard Villar
چکیده

At a conference the other day, while hotly debating the role of hip arthroscopic surgery in the management of osteoarthritis, a friend and colleague announced to the assembled throng, 'We know that hip arthroscopy doesn't work'. You would not have expected the Editor-in-Chief of this journal to remain silent at that moment and I certainly was not. However, what the statement did highlight, of course, is what do any of us mean when we say an operation works? The first thing to remember is that hip arthroscopy is not an operation, it is a technique. One major issue, to my mind, is the apparent obsession that the success, or otherwise , of hip arthroscopy is intimately linked to femoroace-tabular impingement (FAI). That close association has brought with it many problems. I hear of regions, indeed countries that are considering rejecting hip arthroscopic surgery based solely on the assessment that it may not work for FAI. Believe me when I say, if FAI disappeared tomorrow there would still be plenty enough for a hip arthro-scopic surgeon to do. There are some surgeons around who were arthroscoping hips well before FAI was ever re-invented. How about stabilization, labral repair, labral grafting , chondral repair, loose body removal, synovectomy, sepsis, debridement, extra-articular techniques and plenty more besides? For the future of hip arthroscopy, certainly when seen from the viewpoint of this ageing orthopaedic surgeon, the sooner we can unlink hip arthroscopy from FAI in the managerial mind, so much the better. By all means lay out an algorithm for the management of FAI but do that for FAI not for hip arthroscopy. But to say an operation works depends on who you are. One surgeon may feel that the definition of success is if a patient makes it to the Recovery Area after the procedure while another is seeking 2 years of pain relief to justify recommending surgery. Meanwhile the hospital manager might prefer a short stay, no chance of readmission, and as little expenditure as may seem reasonable. The patient, who is after all the major player in all of this, might have an entirely different view. Only the other day a 40-year-old patient came to my clinic with cam FAI. I offered him hip arthroscopic surgery based on an 80% chance of success. To me that seemed reasonable and reflected my own performance figures, not those borrowed from elsewhere. However, I …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for dermatologists: What shall we do when we don’t know what to do?

What shall we do when we have done everything we could for the diagnosis and treatment of a patient, but were not successful? What shall we do when there is no definite treatment for a patient? What shall we do when we have no diagnosis or treatment for a patient? Some useful suggestions are presented here to get rid of these situations.

متن کامل

آیرونی در مقالات شمس

Irony is a type of diction that is used nearly equivalent to current literary idioms such as comic rhetorical question, metaphor, antanagoge, blaming, comical allusion, sarcasm, mockery and punning. In other words irony is the amusing or strange aspect of a situation that is very different from what we expect, or the use of words that say the opposite of what we really mean. This kind of dict...

متن کامل

Joseph Kosuth’s thoughts and Works: Research in the Wittgensteinian Origin of his Conceptual and anti-Aesthetics Trend

This article tries to elucidate Kosuth’s intention in the presentation on conceptual art. It focuses on an explanation about his opposition on aesthetics and formalism with regard to the Wittgensteinian origin of his measurements. For evaluation of what this artist said and what he performed in his artistic  works, we concentrate on the artist’s article entitled “art after philosophy”. We also ...

متن کامل

-

The development and evolution of any system–person, organization–nation depends on how the system succeeds to bridge the gap between what the system knows and what the system does (with the knowledge). We call this the gap between knowing and doing or the knowing-doing gap. If the system does not do what it knows, it will lose out in competition with other systems, its relative performance in...

متن کامل

The legacy of Islamic world in modern medicine and science

The legacy of the Islamic world in medicine and natural science is the legacy of Greece, increased by many additions, mostly practical. Rhazes, the Iranian, was a talented clinical observer, but not a Harvey. Abd al-Latif, the Arab, was a diligent seeker in anatomy, but in no way to be compared to Vesalius. The Muslims possessed excellent translations of the works of the Hippocratic Corpus and ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016